Survey on Research Data Management in the Czech Republic
EOSC CZ Working Groups bring together hundreds of experts from across the Czech Republic who have long been involved in designing the national data infrastructure, services, and tools for research data management. However, a well-designed infrastructure must be grounded in real research practice—how researchers currently work with data, what barriers they face, and where they encounter systemic limitations.
To verify that the activities of the EOSC CZ initiative are moving in the right direction and responding to the actual needs of the research community, the first national survey on research data management across disciplines and institutional types in the Czech Republic was conducted in 2025. The survey received responses from more than 1,210 respondents, out of approximately 3,800 contacted principal investigators of research projects that were initiated or completed between 2004 and January 2025. The survey focused on how researchers acquire, process, manage, and share research data.
“The survey results showed that a significant part of the research community perceives FAIR principles and responsible data management as a meaningful component of high-quality research. At the same time, researchers feel heavily burdened by administrative requirements, which are often unclear, imprecise, and misaligned with the specifics of research activities,” summarizes the main findings of the survey Pavlína Špringerová. “A typical example is data management plans, which most respondents still view primarily as a formal requirement imposed by funding bodies rather than as a tool that would help them manage data throughout a project. This feedback is particularly important to us, as it highlights areas that require further attention.”
The survey also confirmed that research data are shared relatively commonly in the Czech research environment, though still predominantly through informal channels. The continued storage of data on personal computers or portable media poses risks not only in terms of security and long-term accessibility, but also points to limited awareness of more advanced data management options, including national infrastructure and repository services.
These and other findings provide a clear impulse for the EOSC CZ initiative to more clearly communicate the practical benefits of systematic and responsible research data management and to support the use of national resources and infrastructure in research practice. For these reasons, the survey is planned to be repeated in the coming years to track long-term trends and to evaluate the impact of the development of the national data infrastructure and support for research communities.